Read our blogs, tips and tutorials
Try our exercises or test your skills
Watch our tutorial videos or shorts
Take a self-paced course
Read our recent newsletters
License our courseware
Book expert consultancy
Buy our publications
Get help in using our site
547 attributed reviews in the last 3 years
Refreshingly small course sizes
Outstandingly good courseware
Whizzy online classrooms
Wise Owl trainers only (no freelancers)
Almost no cancellations
We have genuine integrity
We invoice after training
Review 30+ years of Wise Owl
View our top 100 clients
Search our website
We also send out useful tips in a monthly email newsletter ...
Comparing the 5 leading AI tools for image generaton from text Part two of an eight-part series of blogs |
---|
Having recently compared the 4 main AI tools for text prompts, I thought I'd do the same for image generation tools. In this blog series we compare Dall-E (via ChatGPT and separately via Copilot), Firefly, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion for 3 pre-defined tests to see which ones score most highly for cost, ease-of-use, speed, editing ability and above all for quality of image.
|
When choosing AI text-to-image tools, there are 4 obvious names to include:
Tool | Reason to include it |
---|---|
Dall-E | This OpenAI tool was the first one to allow proper generation of images from text prompts, and although it's now mostly accessed from within Microsoft's ChatGPT and Copilot, it's still the one to beat. Originally I was going to cover ChatGPT only, but I've included Copilot as it seems to give significantly different results. |
Midjourney | Midjourney is an independent research laboratory based in San Francisco. It's been used to design a front cover for The Economist (in June 2022) as well as the image which won the digital art competiton at the Colorado State Fair in 2022. Midjourney has a reputation for producing the highest quality images of all of the AI text-to-image tools. |
Stable Diffusion | This product from Stability AI allows open-source editing. The underlying model was trained on a library of some 5 billion images, some of which (it's being alleged in court) were privately owned. |
Adobe Firefly | Any comparison of image generation tools has to include Adobe's offering, since they have dominated the world of images for so long. |
Below are some notes on the tools which didn't make the cut.
Claude is great, but .... it doesn't do images:
Shame, really - maybe by the time you're reading this Anthropic will have added this feature to Claude.
This would have been an obvious candidate for inclusion in this review, were it not for this message on Google's website:
I'm sure this will come back bigger and better, but for now ...
I did try with this high-flying Australian company's image generator tool, but it just didn't quite seem up to scratch:
Things like this didn't inspire confidence, but my main reason for not including Canva in this review was its low profile on the Internet compared to the other tools.
The great selling-point of this tool is that they remove any risk of copyright infringement, since the tool was trained on the vast Getty image library:
The Getty strapline - but I have to confess I don't worry much about my use of the other text-to-image tools. Maybe I should?
Here's why I decided not to review this tool:
This is a different ballpark to the pricing for the other tools I've included in this review, and I can't see many readers being willing to pay these prices.
So having established what tools we're going to look at, let's now see what we'll ask each to do!
Some other pages relevant to the above blogs include:
Kingsmoor House
Railway Street
GLOSSOP
SK13 2AA
Landmark Offices
99 Bishopsgate
LONDON
EC2M 3XD
Holiday Inn
25 Aytoun Street
MANCHESTER
M1 3AE
© Wise Owl Business Solutions Ltd 2024. All Rights Reserved.